Archive for the 'dux' Category

DUX 2007: Thomas de Zengotita

Of all the speakers featured at DUX, there was one who stood out among them all: Thomas de Zengotita. This is not a slight to the other speakers, as there were a number of outstanding addresses. But de Zegotita’s talk was fascinating in content, delivery, and style. Neither doctoral candidate nor corporate researcher, rather a crotchety professor who delivered his talk without aid of a slide show or other visuals. This alone made him stand out. But more meaningfully, he was able to take many of the disparate ideas we’d been exposed to over the prior three days and synthesize them into a coherent and compelling narrative. Here is my take on his lecture:

MeidatedLiving in a Mediated World

The fundamental premise of his talk was our existence in a mediated world (”a web of preferences that both vies for our attention through shameless flattery and offers us the opportunity to construct identities based on what we buy”) and how that affects how we see ourselves and thus everything else that we do. De Zengotita argues that the written word is the foundation of this mediated world. It was, he says, the act of reading and writing that enabled individuals’ sense of autonomy, of freedom within one’s own mind.

The growth of that seed into our universe of signage, individualism, consumption, and - of course - media of all sorts has given rise to our modern Celebrity Society, a world where one thing we (as spectators) share is our awareness of celebrities.

But now, with the rise of social media, that paradigm is morphing again. Look around you: We are all staging our own lives with ourselves as the star. This is manifested in many ways: In video games, where the player is the star and spectator at the same time; On the social web, with our own web pages that celebrate everybody - and our circles of friends; through blogs, YouTube videos, and a seemingly endless stream of new technology.

The Flattered Self

Our mediated world has birthed the rise of the Flattered Self - an entire culture dedicated to inciting and then placating the desires and ears of the individual ego. Advertisements, entertainment, friendships and even jobs must somehow address our unique needs.

De Zengotita asserts that representations of all kinds, by their nature, address our egos. Signs tell you where you are and how to get where you want to go. Advertisements register with our emotionally. Even your co-worker’s comment on your Facebook photo serves this paradigm. But it can be overwhelming.

Of course, we can’t all be celebrities, can we? In the mediated age, attention is the only scarce resource. So it becomes necessary to filter the tidal wave of information and representations. And our media consumption technology is serving this need - email, iPods, Tivo, and RSS all help us control our media intake. Here de Zengotita acknowledged David Peskovitz’s concept of sipping from the Information Firehose.

FusionThe Age of Fusion

Now that we have achieved nearly absolute control over the content, style, and timing of what we consume, where do we go? More personalization. We are now in the Age of Fusion. From remixes to mashups, genre bending rules. But why? Because everyone is making stuff out of what is around them., and all creators are looking for some way to be original.

So even creation is mediated. But haven’t things always been mediated? That is, even language itself is a medium. Perhaps. But the sheer quantity, quality, and ubiquity of media is now so awesome as to be inescapable. It was only in the 60’s, de Zengotita says, that realizing that everything is mediated became common sense. This an extremely subtle, but radical distinction.

Extreme modern examples of both the Age of Fusion and a Mediated world include transgenderism and body modification. The reality that even the most basic building blocks of identity and even physical being can be mediated, altered, and ultimately determined by the individual is a profound shift in which we have taken the first steps toward replacing God with ourselves.

Conclusion

It is overly ambitious, I think, to attempt to summarize this broad-reaching lecture. But I did take away several key ideas:

  • A Mediated World: Any attempt to understand modern design, culture, or media must first adopt the Mediated frame. That is being self-aware of our environment as largely, if not completely, filtered.
  • Celebrity Society: is both an outgrowth and driver of the modern individual’s need to feel recognized, flattered, and celebrated.
  • Age of Fusion: media, cultures, and individuals are no longer bound by predetermined limitations. With modern design culture, the means of production have fallen into the hands of the workers, who now posses the power to mold media, society, and self.

DUX 2007: Making Sense of it All

logo.jpg

Taking Stock

It’s been a few days since DUX 2007 ended and I have spent some time thinking about the event, reviewing my notes, letting the deep thoughts marinate. Overall it was a terrific conference, easily the best one I have attended. It was not without flaw, but taken on the whole I have no doubt that it was time and (corporate) money well spent.

Frankly, a major appeal of this year’s DUX was the location: Chicago. This is one of those self-fulfilling prophecy sorts of things, I imagine. By holding the event in such a central and desirable location, the organizers attracted more and better speakers. This pays dividends to the attendees, but on the other hand Chicago is an expensive city.

DUX Presentations: A mixed bag.

I was fortunate to attend the Monday tutorial by Kevin Brooks: Storytelling in business presentation and design. (I will share some of what I learned in a later post). For me it was a terrific way to start the event. It was a storytelling workshop, in effect, and though the focus on applicability to business presentations was minor, Brooks’ teaching style, the smallish class size, and the half-day format all contributed to a terrific start to DUX.

With the Tutorials portion occupying most of Monday, the main event started at 4:15pm with a semi-random series of talks that were a good preview of the mix of style and substance that we’d witness during the following two days. Some talks were overly academic, pie-in-the-sky experiments, others were visionary and conceptual. Some straddled the boundary between academia and practice.

Simplicity & The Information Firehose

There were two standout presentations from the first group. First, BJ Fogg’s video-delivered examination of Simplicity. He is working to develop definable measurements of simplicity, and with a few clear statements, helped the audience grasp his work. It was a fun, engaging, effective and enlightening presentation, and the only one delivered solely via video.

David Pescovitz‘ presentation on Sipping from the Information Firehose was an entertaining and exuberant look at how technology can help us sift through the age of zillionics and access relevant and meaningful information. One example: Picture yourself walking through downtown, while a digital readout projected inside the lens of your glasses, shows information such as your current location, instant access to customer reviews of a restaurant you are looking at, or real-time information on physical presence of people in your social network.

SpiderCrabOn the other hand, some of the talks were all but indecipherable. I foumd it difficult to cull the meaning behind or application of the SpiderCrab, Bi-Polar Laddering (?) and AnyPhone studies. These talks, however, offered a taste of the more eccentric* elements of the conference that we would be fed over the following two days. They were academic and experiemental in nature, like many others at the conference. And I was lost.

Overall

The conference was dense with fascinating peeks into emerging concepts, novel studies of human behavior impacted by technology, and glimpses into technologies that lay just around the proverbial corner.

The high concentration of dissertations and presentations of findings lent the event an overly-academic focus, but on the bright side this kept it from being a collection of predictions and product previews of private-beta social apps.

Regardless of particular subject matter, I was disappointed by the some of the speakers, many of whom appeared to be delivering oral versions of their findings papers. The accompanying PowerPoint prezos, collections of bullet points projected and then read to the audience, were often sleep inducing.

duxppl.jpgMeanwhile, many in the audience were busy multitasking. I took notes in my new Moleskine, thoughtfully provided in the conference welcome pack. But anyone with a BlackBerry, iPhone or laptop was reading, posting, texting, and emailing, or generally busy doing anything but listening attentively.

A major disappointment was the lack of actual social media interaction for the event. There was no official blog, no DUX twitter, no live online question submission tool, no speaker ratings or feedback mechanism. I have no doubt that any - or preferably all - of these types of tools would have kept the audience more engaged.

Wait, there’s more!

The conference was so full of new ideas and great speakers. Over the next week or so, I will post additional entries on DUX, focusing on particular talks and themes that emerged from the conference.